Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.4% regression in sunspider at 425974:426009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998351152157630832
,
Oct 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@425973 659.889 11.1719 18 good chromium@426009 671.778 22.4226 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 657534 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests sunspider Test Metric: Total/Total Relative Change: 0.25% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/779 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998351152157630832 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5813789025370112 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 21 2016
Recovered and only on one bot => flake |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pras...@chromium.org
, Oct 19 2016