Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.8% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 424389:424405 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 18 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998484670288267328
,
Oct 18 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author yangguo@chromium.org === Hi yangguo@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : [Math] implement Math.random as TFJ builtin. Author : yangguo Commit description: R=bmeurer@chromium.org BUG=v8:5049, v8:5086 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2402363002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40149} Commit : 0d8e52123eefaf3858005f96f0db3af037222853 Date : Tue Oct 11 06:47:15 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424388 202180 2268.57 8 good chromium@424397 202690 2123.01 8 good chromium@424398 202615 2415.58 5 good chromium@424398,v8@b884a51ff2 200275 708.444 5 good chromium@424398,v8@127798897f 203485 1852.16 5 good chromium@424398,v8@90ebb7b4dd 201714 2669.18 5 good chromium@424398,v8@3d5ae0f7d3 201727 2672.55 5 good chromium@424398,v8@0d8e52123e 209060 1656.29 5 bad <-- chromium@424399 206821 2348.5 8 bad chromium@424401 208942 1869.54 5 bad chromium@424405 206893 2517.57 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 656895 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:allocated_objects_size_avg Relative Change: 2.51% Score: 99.8 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2192 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998484670288267328 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5851793311924224 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 19 2016
This is due to the TF stub not being force inlined. I'll work on addressing this soon.
,
Oct 19 2016
Actually, this is somewhat surprising. I thought this was a performance regression when this is actually a memory regression. Will take a look.
,
Nov 18 2016
,
May 6 2017
This regression has been included in a stable release and that stable channel is now deprecated. I'm closing this so that we won't have unresponsive performance regressions in the future. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jgruber@chromium.org
, Oct 18 2016