Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 424405:424420 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 17 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998530152609334192
,
Oct 17 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424404 91933692 505855 18 good chromium@424420 92073354 323822 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 656747 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_www_baidu_com_s_word_google Relative Change: 0.09% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4245 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998530152609334192 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5214565657214976 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 18 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998509105762771584
,
Oct 18 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424404 85421486 582543 18 good chromium@424420 85383541 389027 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 656747 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.www.baidu.com.s.word.google memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_www_baidu_com_s_word_google Relative Change: 0.19% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4248 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998509105762771584 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5883855779659776 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 18 2016
Not a clear regression. Bisect won't reproduce, and did not reproduce on health plan bots. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Oct 17 2016