Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2%-1.5% regression in oortonline_tbmv2 at 425235:425265 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 17 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998554501764950800
,
Oct 17 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@425234 570228 2847.76 18 good chromium@425265 570243 2547.94 18 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect Bug ID: 656597 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests oortonline_tbmv2 Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 0.04% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1742 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998554501764950800 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5319660151504896 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 21 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jgruber@chromium.org
, Oct 17 2016