This patch was reverted in https://codereview.chromium.org/2403363003, and it seems that this revert has fixed this regression.
I will keep this bug active for re-landing the patch in question.
It looks like the expanded samples are present only in the beginning of the test:
Before: [0.1068115234375,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
After: [0.14984130859375,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
Number of expanded samples stays approximately the same, it is the length of the first reporting interval which has gone down:
Before:
expanded_speech_samples = 520 expanded_noise_samples = 3480 timestamps_since_last_report = 37440 expand_rate = 1750
After:
expanded_speech_samples = 1084 expanded_noise_samples = 3160 timestamps_since_last_report = 28320 expand_rate = 2455
Is it a problem with the metric?
+hlundin,
Hi Henrik,
altimin@ is now trying to relanding the CL and he figured the reason why expand_rate is affected.
Would you help judge if this is acceptable?
Yes, it's the same thing chopped into pieces and relanded. I still stand by my claim that it's not a real regression but an artifact of measurement process.
Comment 1 by minyue@chromium.org
, Oct 14 2016