New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 655715 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.7% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 423804:423825

Project Member Reported by lanwei@google.com, Oct 13 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com, Oct 13 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=655715

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgjZKtjwgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-ati
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 13 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N   Good?
chromium@423803  16.3744  0.302752  18  good
chromium@423825  16.4498  0.36146   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64ati_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 655715

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.top_25_smooth
Test Metric: frame_times/https___www.google.com__hl_en_q_barack+obama
Relative Change: 1.12%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64ati_perf_bisect/builds/1606
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998897290454312384


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5832084914962432

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 4 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Oct 14 2016

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 25 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64ati_perf_bisect/builds/1625
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 25 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64ati_perf_bisect/builds/1626
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 27 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64ati_perf_bisect/builds/1628
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
Labels: Performance-Responsiveness

Sign in to add a comment