Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
27.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 424461:424486 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 12 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998979075788959344
,
Oct 13 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424460 163119104 13681763 8 good chromium@424462 163492659 12321326 5 good chromium@424462,catapult@840e04295a 211307725 15203674 5 bad chromium@424463 202892902 13169442 5 bad chromium@424464 211569869 7519010 5 bad chromium@424467 209944576 16325700 5 bad chromium@424473 201244672 14285549 8 bad chromium@424486 210783437 16611948 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 655258 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Relative Change: 28.43% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2184 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998979075788959344 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5869326307950592 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997725868688707536
,
Oct 27 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424300 168919040 4269408 5 good chromium@424400 160661504 18227021 5 good chromium@424450 156368896 17787027 8 good chromium@424457 168892826 4309858 5 good chromium@424460 166533530 3576849 5 good chromium@424462 207430490 15043956 210 good chromium@424475 201981952 19450175 8 bad chromium@424500 210311578 4742561 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 655258 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.www.google.co.uk.hl.en.q.science memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Relative Change: 24.50% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2219 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997725868688707536 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5032063873318912 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 3 2017
Only N9s. WontFix.
,
Mar 14 2017
,
Apr 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982659670323570000
,
Apr 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Suspected Commit Range 1 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/5b99bb23039bb2457a509282f8fc9b839072ca8a..62dc3ff33032432888e0f08a2915df0e88b7c19d Revision Result N chromium@424300 168919040 +- 4269408 5 good chromium@424400 160661504 +- 18227021 5 good chromium@424450 156368896 +- 17787027 8 good chromium@424457 168892826 +- 4309858 5 good chromium@424460 166533530 +- 3576849 5 good chromium@424462 207430490 +- 15043956 210 good chromium@424475 201981952 +- 19450175 8 bad chromium@424500 210311578 +- 4742561 5 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.www.google.co.uk.hl.en.q.science memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982659670323570000 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5032063873318912 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tdres...@chromium.org
, Oct 12 2016