Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.8% regression in blink_perf.layout at 424102:424103 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 11 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999069170531455456
,
Oct 12 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/761 Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.
,
Oct 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997727674699944832
,
Oct 26 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424000 2.71091 0.0743357 5 good chromium@424500 2.45966 0.0412196 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 654855 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Test Metric: flexbox-with-stretch-layout/flexbox-with-stretch-layout Relative Change: 8.59% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/801 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997727674699944832 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5807810061795328 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 3 2017
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982576249551475088 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tdres...@chromium.org
, Oct 11 2016