New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 654024 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Oct 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

2.1%-3.6% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 423619:423674

Project Member Reported by qyears...@chromium.org, Oct 7 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@423618  54076068  357973   18  good
chromium@423674  54190529  860049   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 654024

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html
Relative Change: 0.13%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/743
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999432575064268768


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5311345245814784

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 10 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@423618  56164516  334929   18  good
chromium@423674  56243990  280198   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 654024

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_https_m_facebook_com_rihanna
Relative Change: 0.46%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/757
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999167463578338048


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5830720121995264

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment