Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.1%-3.6% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 423619:423674 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999432575064268768
,
Oct 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@423618 54076068 357973 18 good chromium@423674 54190529 860049 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 654024 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html Relative Change: 0.13% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/743 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999432575064268768 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5311345245814784 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 10 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999167463578338048
,
Oct 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@423618 56164516 334929 18 good chromium@423674 56243990 280198 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 654024 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_https_m_facebook_com_rihanna Relative Change: 0.46% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/757 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999167463578338048 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5830720121995264 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 10 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Oct 7 2016