All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=653845

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgpf7EsAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg5fCA4ggM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus6

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999463218525413568

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@421512  2617978  69692.8  18  good
chromium@421530  2581202  62339.7  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 653845

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2
Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:allocated_objects_size_avg
Relative Change: 0.26%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2625
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999463218525413568


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5877782846898176

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

This regression has been included in a stable release and that stable channel is now deprecated. I'm closing this so that we won't have unresponsive performance regressions in the future.