Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.1%-18.3% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 422824:422966 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999463671789623472
,
Oct 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@422857 14130580 575179 18 good chromium@422878 14474711 717371 18 good chromium@422884 14268127 636532 12 good chromium@422886 15413623 716492 12 bad chromium@422887 15186728 506337 8 bad chromium@422889 15328139 508958 18 bad chromium@422899 15415002 747352 18 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64intel_perf_bisect Bug ID: 653843 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_desktop Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:allocated_objects_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:allocated_objects_size_max Relative Change: 10.78% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/1194 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999463671789623472 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5297493976285184 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 18 2016
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624181001451024
,
Apr 12 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: b873e02f086898e946c374f628fdc7b1cb47ce37 bad_revision : 022a7317076c57094cd6137ded6e9be08b666f12 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:allocated_objects_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:allocated_objects_size_max Revision Result N chromium@422857 14774163 +- 2784383 14 good chromium@422878 15116035 +- 2343784 14 good chromium@422884 14482238 +- 2029586 9 good chromium@422886 15625885 +- 1657170 9 bad chromium@422887 15610724 +- 2739080 14 bad chromium@422889 15715545 +- 2925436 21 bad chromium@422899 15781418 +- 1622130 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624181001451024 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5297493976285184 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 6 2017
This regression has been included in a stable release and that stable channel is now deprecated. I'm closing this so that we won't have unresponsive performance regressions in the future. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by epertoso@chromium.org
, Oct 7 2016