Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
22.1%-45.9% regression in v8.browsing_mobile_ignition at 414881:418000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999463941452458832
,
Oct 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@414880 80.1149 5.94847 7 good chromium@416440 80.541 7.27892 10 good chromium@417240 84.6471 8.53519 12 good chromium@417620 86.0685 7.79128 9 good chromium@417810 85.6345 5.4381 8 good chromium@418000 97.2146 6.95336 12 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 653842 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Test Metric: v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum Relative Change: 16.07% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4203 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999463941452458832 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5254527928762368 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 18 2016
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982632447087481056
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum Suspected Commit Range 1 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/1096190784ad7c30c25929df0709d4878c0a4a45..dee727c8ac26512c3f6fe852fdefb00186909a89 Revision Result N chromium@414880 80.1149 +- 5.94847 7 good chromium@416440 80.541 +- 7.27892 10 good chromium@417240 84.6471 +- 8.53519 12 good chromium@417620 86.0685 +- 7.79128 9 good chromium@417810 85.6345 +- 5.4381 8 good chromium@418000 97.2146 +- 6.95336 12 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982632447087481056 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5254527928762368 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 6 2017
This regression has been included in a stable release and that stable channel is now deprecated. I'm closing this so that we won't have unresponsive performance regressions in the future. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by epertoso@chromium.org
, Oct 7 2016