Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
22.6%-49.7% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 at 406346:420666 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999657429035051024
,
Oct 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@420258 12.7508 3.0218 18 good chromium@420286 11.9154 2.0181 18 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 653000 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Test Metric: v8-gc-scavenger_max/v8-gc-scavenger_max Relative Change: 6.51% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6972 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999657429035051024 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6440759710973952 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 11 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999099965623998464
,
Oct 12 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@406345 3.79678 0.201914 18 good chromium@408135 4.11789 0.754176 18 good chromium@409033 3.94508 0.462343 12 good chromium@409481 4.70875 3.09229 12 good chromium@409703 3.81539 0.170385 18 good chromium@409814 4.01411 0.547612 18 good chromium@409925 4.45928 0.957695 18 bad chromium@413506 4.32933 0.993429 12 bad chromium@420666 4.02925 0.135473 12 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 653000 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Test Metric: v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max Relative Change: 5.82% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6998 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999099965623998464 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5294969525370880 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997727160345604768
,
Oct 26 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@406300 11.0446 2.46731 18 good chromium@420700 12.3956 1.86991 18 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 653000 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Test Metric: v8-gc-scavenger_max/v8-gc-scavenger_max Relative Change: 8.87% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/7024 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997727160345604768 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5217729135509504 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 24 2017
Graph recovered.
,
Mar 14 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624222741486208 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hpayer@chromium.org
, Oct 5 2016