Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.2% regression in media.tough_video_cases_extra at 421687:421711 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999804200614234240
,
Oct 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@421686 22.7694 1.77329 18 good chromium@421711 22.525 1.22519 18 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 652330 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra Test Metric: seek/tulip2.mp4_seek_warm Relative Change: 1.21% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2418 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999804200614234240 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5264649354739712 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 3 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hubbe@chromium.org
, Oct 3 2016