Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
18.1% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 419771:419862 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999808953930348528
,
Oct 4 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/515 Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.
,
Oct 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999635771925587472
,
Oct 6 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@419809 174.065 20.3079 18 good chromium@419839 172.457 18.5132 18 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 652305 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___mixi.jp_ Relative Change: 9.88% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2425 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999635771925587472 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5328010658447360 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 11 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999065896945775216
,
Oct 12 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@419700 171.054 10.5316 12 good chromium@419770 168.286 10.7651 12 good chromium@419839 160.45 4.93635 8 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 652305 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___mixi.jp_ Relative Change: 5.46% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2439 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999065896945775216 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6398292399751168 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 2 2016
fixed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tdres...@chromium.org
, Oct 3 2016