New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 652247 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Oct 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

89.5% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 422067:422081

Project Member Reported by tdres...@chromium.org, Oct 3 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=652247

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgldnwqwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-galaxy-s5

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N   Good?
chromium@422066  16.1939  0.368161  17  good
chromium@422081  16.1562  0.372189  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 652247

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases
Test Metric: mean_input_event_latency/mean_input_event_latency
Relative Change: 1.55%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1055
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999819055893660640


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5856522289020928

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N   Good?
chromium@422066  12.2106  0.424853  18  good
chromium@422081  12.2665  0.308386  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 652247

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases
Test Metric: mean_input_event_latency/raf_canvas.html
Relative Change: 0.44%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1061
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999730777418897824


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5908030758060032

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment