Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
89.5% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 422067:422081 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999819055893660640
,
Oct 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@422066 16.1939 0.368161 17 good chromium@422081 16.1562 0.372189 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 652247 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Test Metric: mean_input_event_latency/mean_input_event_latency Relative Change: 1.55% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1055 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999819055893660640 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5856522289020928 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 4 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999730777418897824
,
Oct 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@422066 12.2106 0.424853 18 good chromium@422081 12.2665 0.308386 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 652247 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Test Metric: mean_input_event_latency/raf_canvas.html Relative Change: 0.44% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1061 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999730777418897824 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5908030758060032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 11 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tdres...@chromium.org
, Oct 3 2016