Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.9%-17% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 420543:420565 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 30 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000055971364279568
,
Oct 1 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author ccameron@chromium.org === Hi ccameron@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Mac video: Add blacklist entry for AVSampleBufferDisplayLayer Author : ccameron Commit description: This leaks IOSurfaces on 10.9. Include 10.10 in the blacklist because it has not been sufficiently tested. BUG= 632178 CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;master.tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;master.tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2366433002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#420543} Commit : f33642d15eb090f26cf37c40b04f2ba62a95e243 Date : Fri Sep 23 02:15:05 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@420542 566.8 4.65833 5 good chromium@420543 621.2 16.5741 5 bad <-- chromium@420544 625.0 4.51664 6 bad chromium@420545 626.0 12.5167 4 bad chromium@420548 623.667 13.8804 6 bad chromium@420554 632.75 5.90903 4 bad chromium@420565 633.4 12.7789 5 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 651976 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases Test Metric: idle_wakeups_browser/idle_wakeups_browser Relative Change: 11.75% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2412 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000055971364279568 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5902788482039808 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 19 2016
This moves us to a higher-power and worse display path. Unfortunately, the alternative leaks memory, so, WontFix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jrumm...@chromium.org
, Sep 30 2016