Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
159.3%-170.8% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 421797:421825 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 30 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000093279119336912
,
Oct 1 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@421796 244.54 104.839 18 good chromium@421825 237.381 72.2245 18 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Bug ID: 651811 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___zol.com.cn_ Relative Change: 14.75% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_11_perf_bisect/builds/933 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000093279119336912 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5049118500585472 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999816112754811488
,
Oct 3 2016
Kicked new bisect
,
Oct 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@421796 286.026 123.072 18 good chromium@421825 331.709 93.3915 18 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Bug ID: 651811 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Test Metric: timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___zol.com.cn_ Relative Change: 21.88% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_11_perf_bisect/builds/941 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999816112754811488 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6387342665842688 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 6 2016
perf sheriff fixit: unsetting owners of bugs owned by sheriffs to clarify the sheriffing rotation triages the bugs.
,
Nov 22 2016
,
Jan 6 2017
Archiving as bisection is difficult and there's been no movement. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Sep 30 2016