Consider making it possible to validate mojo structs without using StructTraits |
|||
Issue descriptionI don't think there's a clear need for this yet: right now, the code base is still in transition, so we're typemapping a lot of things. However, in the future, this may change: once we've converted significant portions of the codebase over to Mojo, it may no longer be desirable to maintain C++ mirrors of mojo structs. At that point in time, we'll probably want a way to write validators without actually typemapping.
,
May 2 2018
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1014464 is one instance where this would have been useful.
,
Oct 17
,
Nov 15
Triaging at medium priority. This is something I think we'd like to look at in 2019. |
|||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||
Comment 1 by yzshen@chromium.org
, Jan 9 2017