New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 650685 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 2017
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.3% regression in smoothness.key_mobile_sites_smooth at 420917:420991

Project Member Reported by rmcilroy@chromium.org, Sep 27 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=650685

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgpf20uQkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 28 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev    N   Good?
chromium@420916  17.052   0.021107   18  good
chromium@420991  17.0599  0.0228664  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 650685

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.key_mobile_sites_smooth
Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times
Relative Change: 0.00%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4155
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000352291627634192


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6097777749131264

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean   Std Dev    N   Good?
chromium@420916  17.06  0.0195655  18  good
chromium@420991  17.05  0.023015   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 650685

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.key_mobile_sites_smooth
Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times
Relative Change: 0.05%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4165
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000084308309190192


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5816208148922368

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev    N   Good?
chromium@420916  17.0698  0.0196499  17  good
chromium@420991  17.0668  0.0295808  17  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 650685

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.key_mobile_sites_smooth
Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times
Relative Change: 0.03%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4186
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999628934690872480


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5843850994647040

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Owner: ----
perf sheriff fixit: unsetting owner for bugs owned by perf sheriffs to clarify that they are triaged by a rotation.

Comment 9 by benhenry@google.com, Nov 22 2016

Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Archiving as bisection is difficult and there's been no movement.

Sign in to add a comment