Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.5% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 418882:418939 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 27 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000367257390393968
,
Sep 28 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@418881 1543235 4811.13 12 good chromium@418889 1542222 3308.05 5 good chromium@418893 1549659 2894.37 5 bad chromium@418896 1555237 1791.75 5 bad chromium@418910 1550497 4597.91 12 bad chromium@418939 1550535 4657.72 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 650627 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 0.44% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3335 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000367257390393968 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5301200902160384 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 5 2016
Not significant.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624147793580256
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg Suspected Commit Range 1 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/cddda4b3eebaacab696a28aa18f89f92aceda3a9..201c93cdb160081b282f42075786282a5a9f43a8 Revision Result N chromium@418881 1543235 +- 4811.13 12 good chromium@418889 1542222 +- 3308.05 5 good chromium@418893 1549659 +- 2894.37 5 bad chromium@418896 1555237 +- 1791.75 5 bad chromium@418910 1550497 +- 4597.91 12 bad chromium@418939 1550535 +- 4657.72 8 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624147793580256 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5301200902160384 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hpayer@chromium.org
, Sep 27 2016