Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 420028:420043 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 27 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000367369745869904
,
Sep 28 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@420027 1378925 1588.01 5 good chromium@420035 1372257 1363.66 5 good chromium@420036 1371947 1747.57 5 good chromium@420036,v8@8c87ae9b88 1392487 641.817 5 bad chromium@420037 1391811 1004.8 5 bad chromium@420039 1392098 704.586 5 bad chromium@420043 1390884 1459.62 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 650618 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:allocated_objects_size_avg Relative Change: 0.87% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/700 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000367369745869904 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5821913878757376 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 5 2016
Reverted. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hpayer@chromium.org
, Sep 27 2016