Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.6% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 420826:420835 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000471383990082320
,
Sep 27 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@420825 892213 2454.18 5 good chromium@420830 891929 8541.19 5 good chromium@420830,v8@84145a149b 903357 3852.65 5 good chromium@420830,v8@85575cd8ee 894867 2408.41 5 good chromium@420831 914117 3416.0 5 bad chromium@420832 913409 4946.35 4 bad chromium@420833 914165 5531.49 5 bad chromium@420835 910822 3785.8 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 650176 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 2.09% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1643 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000471383990082320 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5226980109189120 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999657868074384096
,
Oct 6 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@419540 1564615 3750.61 5 good chromium@419988 1570433 5022.15 5 good chromium@420016 1568448 3878.47 5 good chromium@420030 1583927 7049.44 5 good chromium@420044 1606408 4382.17 5 bad chromium@420100 1610802 4340.21 5 bad chromium@420212 1607441 2620.61 5 bad chromium@420436 1605184 5935.08 5 bad chromium@421330 1617969 1881.59 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 650176 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 3.41% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4178 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999657868074384096 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861328290316288 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 18 2016
,
Jan 19 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651643033689952
,
Apr 12 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg Change : 2.67% | 821138.56 -> 843037.706667 Suspected Commit Range 36 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/c7e97c1604e0d4c9e42f357365ba609fb3ef92fd..5728b19d6b9f8c94c83e1736c54e9c0db136e25e Revision Result N chromium@420825 821139 +- 5971.76 6 good chromium@420830 820860 +- 5131.4 6 good chromium@420830,v8@dfbb3db5ef --- --- build failure --- --- --- too many build failures to list chromium@420830,v8@9041e3bfae --- --- build failure chromium@420831 842469 +- 12162.0 6 bad chromium@420832 843984 +- 9359.14 5 bad chromium@420833 843010 +- 9025.07 6 bad chromium@420835 843038 +- 7080.32 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651643033689952 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5226980109189120 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hpayer@chromium.org
, Sep 26 2016