Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
80.9% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 at 420055:420087 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 25 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000579421811365712
,
Sep 25 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@420054 229.698 54.9098 18 good chromium@420087 229.639 70.2799 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 649995 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Test Metric: v8-gc-total_max/v8-gc-total_max Relative Change: 43.98% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1032 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000579421811365712 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5881151208554496 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999843136109214544
,
Oct 3 2016
This looks like it might be a real regression. I restarted bisect.
,
Oct 3 2016
,
Oct 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@420054 240.0 26.2409 18 good chromium@420087 237.467 30.1777 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 649995 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Test Metric: v8-gc-total_max/v8-gc-total_max Relative Change: 6.49% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1053 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999843136109214544 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5856445919133696 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 6 2016
Bisect bot cannot reproduce it. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benjhayden@chromium.org
, Sep 25 2016