New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 649995 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Oct 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

80.9% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 at 420055:420087

Project Member Reported by benjhayden@chromium.org, Sep 25 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=649995

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgxYqrkwgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-galaxy-s5
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 25 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@420054  229.698  54.9098  18  good
chromium@420087  229.639  70.2799  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 649995

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2
Test Metric: v8-gc-total_max/v8-gc-total_max
Relative Change: 43.98%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1032
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000579421811365712


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5881151208554496

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Cc: benjhayden@chromium.org
Owner: perezju@chromium.org
This looks like it might be a real regression.
I restarted bisect.

Cc: perezju@chromium.org
Owner: u...@chromium.org

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@420054  240.0    26.2409  18  good
chromium@420087  237.467  30.1777  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 649995

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2
Test Metric: v8-gc-total_max/v8-gc-total_max
Relative Change: 6.49%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1053
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999843136109214544


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5856445919133696

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 8 by u...@chromium.org, Oct 6 2016

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Bisect bot cannot reproduce it.

Sign in to add a comment