Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.5% regression in dromaeo.domcoretraverse at 420019:420034 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 25 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000579479587696608
,
Sep 25 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@420018 146.493 2.89854 18 good chromium@420034 146.135 2.75442 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 649991 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests dromaeo.domcoretraverse Test Metric: dom/dom Relative Change: 2.08% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1029 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000579479587696608 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5827338690887680 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999842208431851440
,
Oct 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Change the CompilerDispatcherJob to take a SharedFunctionInfo Author : jochen Commit description: This means we can no longer take the closure's context to parse, but need to rely on the outer scope info. Since it's not possible to get that, however, for lazy functions, we introduce a new field to SharedFunctionInfo that stores the outer scope info whenever available. BUG= v8:5215 R=marja@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2358503002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39548} Commit : 0f0912dd23911eec6d1c5e6d3ebba1ece0ff3361 Date : Tue Sep 20 12:08:42 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@420018 147.163 1.44019 12 good chromium@420026 148.571 1.68538 12 good chromium@420027 148.275 2.18336 12 good chromium@420027,v8@4f5695229e 146.851 3.59123 12 good chromium@420027,v8@0f0912dd23 143.4 2.17526 12 bad <-- chromium@420027,v8@05eb56798e 144.635 2.01584 8 bad chromium@420027,v8@b88df1c9e4 146.257 3.54202 8 bad chromium@420028 145.767 2.93199 8 bad chromium@420030 144.948 3.69813 12 bad chromium@420034 144.974 2.33817 12 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 649991 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests dromaeo.domcoretraverse Test Metric: dom/dom Relative Change: 0.32% Score: 90.0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1054 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999842208431851440 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5318309468176384 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 3 2016
Jochen, PTAL at the above regression graphs and bisect.
,
Oct 11 2016
Perf sheriff ping
,
Oct 12 2016
I don't see a similar change on any other bot, and my change almost only affects code that isn't shipping yet, so I'll close this as wontfix for now
,
Oct 19 2016
Sounds good, thanks :-) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benjhayden@chromium.org
, Sep 25 2016