[MD Settings] Browser does not navigate to page according omnibox URL after search action.
Reported by
rk...@etouch.net,
Sep 22 2016
|
|||||||
Issue descriptionChrome Version:55.0.2868.0 (Official Build) b22235a16193be6cfa6e199a5c7a2427a7b505e6-refs/heads/master@{#420217} OS: Windows(7,8,10) What steps will reproduce the problem? (1) Launch chrome, navigate to chrome://md-settings page. (2) Search something on page, then click on 'Main menu' and navigate to 'Download' section under 'Advanced'. (3) Clear search field and then click on back navigation button, observe page and omnibox URL. Actual: Browser does not navigated to page according omnibox URL. Expected: Browser should navigate to page according omnibox URL. This is a regression issue, broken in 'M-55', will soon update the other info: Good Build: 55.0.2847.0 Bad Build: 55.0.2849.0
,
Sep 28 2016
tommycli@: Could you please take a look at this and help in further investigation.
,
Oct 3 2016
Cc'ing michaelpg@ as well for more inputs on this.
,
Oct 10 2016
Issue is still reproducible on the latest M-55 on chrome version: 55.0.2883.6.
,
Oct 14 2016
,
Oct 18 2016
Generally, we intentionally do not scroll on forward/back events. Getting
the ideal behavior for that would likely not be worth the time.
I think the bigger issue is that navigating to a section after searching does not work unless the section is part of the results.
Working case:
1. Search for "download". Privacy and Downloads display.
2. Open the nav menu and click Downloads. Scrolls the Downloads
section to top.
Broken case:
1. Search for "spell". Privacy and Languages display.
2. Open the nav menu and click Downloads. Nothing happens.
What is the expected behavior here? My instinct is that navigating from the menu should always clear the search, then navigate (even if a section is shown as a search result).
Back button behavior is less concerning to me, but I filed issue 657150 for that. These bugs may end up merging depending on what behavior we want.
,
Oct 18 2016
,
Oct 25 2016
assigning to dpapad, because he has a WIP patch that fixes this (incidentally)
,
Oct 25 2016
,
Nov 9 2016
,
Dec 21 2016
|
|||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||
Comment 1 by msrchandra@chromium.org
, Sep 22 2016Owner: tommycli@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Unconfirmed)