Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.1% regression in smoothness.tough_webgl_cases at 419801:419850 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 22 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000845395636015760
,
Sep 22 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@419800 16.7797 0.386331 18 good chromium@419850 16.7006 0.0541697 18 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Bug ID: 649234 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_webgl_cases Test Metric: frame_times/http___www.khronos.org_registry_webgl_sdk_demos_webkit_Earth.html Relative Change: 0.01% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/492 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000845395636015760 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5543283151863808 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 22 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Sep 22 2016