New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 648735 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
charliea@chromium.org
Closed: Jan 2017
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

cc_perftests failure on chromium.perf/Linux Perf (3) at 419369 - 419388

Project Member Reported by charliea@chromium.org, Sep 20 2016 
Revision range first seen: 419369 - 419388
Link to failing step log: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.perf/builders/Linux%20Perf%20%283%29/builds/17738/steps/cc_perftests/logs/stdio


If the test is disabled, please downgrade to Pri-2.

Going to start a return code bisect on the range.

Comment 2 by charliea@chromium.org, Sep 20 2016 

Snoozing this for 4h in SOM (sheriff-o-matic).
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 20 2016 


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Exit Code  Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@419369  0          N/A      1  good
chromium@419388  0          N/A      1  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 648735

Test Command: ./src/out/Release/cc_perftests --test-launcher-print-test-stdio=always --verbose
Test Metric: Compress256x256BlackAndWhiteGradientImage/ETC1 High
Relative Change: 0.00%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6717
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000967616206099248


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5296995500032000

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by charliea@chromium.org, Jan 28 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Marking this as WontFix (no movement in 3+ months)
►

Sign in to add a comment