Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
42.6%-273.3% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 418381:418512 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 20 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000992389661657408
,
Sep 20 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1009 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 20 2016
,
Oct 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999800514203710960
,
Oct 3 2016
,
Oct 4 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author nednguyen@google.com === Hi nednguyen@google.com, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Revert of Revert "[telemetry] Wire TsProxy through telemetry's network stack." (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2267613002/ ) Author : nednguyen Commit description: Reason for revert: Webview now support --proxy-server flag (see attached bug) Original issue's description: > Revert "[telemetry] Wire TsProxy through telemetry's network stack." > > This reverts commit 9fcccf0b65703994c9541273f00a993806a95356. > > Revert "[Telemetry] Explictly initialize & clean up network_controller" > > This reverts commit 30ce231266c6fb6147bb6df7c56a7eb75c23fccf. > > Seems like webview currently does not support proxy server? > (See attached chromium bug) > > BUG=chromium:639632 > BUG=catapult:#2584 > > TBR=pmeenan@chromium.org > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapult/+/947506bacfb5047857a52033256635faebf38af2 TBR=nednguyen@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG=chromium:639632 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2342503002 Commit : b86cfef4b9da4749ff51e0fc4432869f8209dc42 Date : Wed Sep 14 00:48:51 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@418454 263.203 9.45878 5 good chromium@418462 267.727 7.45602 5 good chromium@418462,catapult@7d108c71d8 256.499 8.06709 5 good chromium@418462,catapult@b86cfef4b9 981.98 11.3023 5 bad <-- chromium@418463 991.157 10.6671 5 bad chromium@418464 995.233 13.8868 5 bad chromium@418466 990.805 14.5189 5 bad chromium@418469 1001.25 38.8282 5 bad chromium@418483 990.724 4.50201 5 bad chromium@418512 1013.34 38.6249 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 648599 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.ebay.com Relative Change: 285.00% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1057 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999800514203710960 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5229465653739520 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 6 2016
,
Dec 21 2016
These will all be invalid as they are specific to Samsung S5s, which we do not trust to give us a signal and have subsequently removed from the waterfalls. If you think this regression is real, please re-open.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982604014416699584 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Sep 20 2016