New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 648158 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Sep 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

100% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 at 419372:419386

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Sep 19 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, Sep 19 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=648158

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgucr1swoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 19 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@419371  33554432  0.0      18  good
chromium@419386  33554432  0.0      18  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 648158

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2
Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:effective_size_max
Relative Change: 0.00%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6938
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001105725465967184


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5781166358003712

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 4 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Sep 19 2016

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 19 2016

Cc: shanmug...@samsung.com
Owner: shanmug...@samsung.com

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author shanmuga.m@samsung.com ===

Hi shanmuga.m@samsung.com, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly
causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether
your CL be related.


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : SVG Image intrinsic size should be used if css style size is 'auto'
Author  : shanmuga.m
Commit description:
  
SVG Image's width and height attributes will use intrinsic size,
if css style size is 'auto'

Spec:
https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/embedded.html#Placement
https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/geometry.html#Sizing

BUG= 493681 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2230963002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#419133}
Commit  : 3c1a3822848d986337573cfaf2817c8a69417791
Date    : Fri Sep 16 08:48:37 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@418371  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@418879  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419006  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419070  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419102  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419118  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419125  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419129  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419131  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419132  16777216  0.0      5  good
chromium@419133  33554432  0.0      5  bad    <--
chromium@419386  33554432  0.0      5  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 648158

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2
Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:effective_size_max
Relative Change: 100.00%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6939
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001086174152700496


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5501488288235520

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Cc: -shanmug...@samsung.com f...@opera.com
Hello,
 Getting permission error like below.

PermissionError: Attempted to access a file from Cloud Storage but you don't have permission. 

could you please provide the access.

Comment 9 by f...@opera.com, Sep 20 2016

It looks like all the graphs have recovered, which suggests that this might've been some sort of flake (no obvious correlation between the two relevant ranges.)

Comment 10 by u...@chromium.org, Sep 20 2016

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
The suspected CL doesn't seem related. Closing since the graphs are recovered.

Sign in to add a comment