Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
100% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 at 419372:419386 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001105725465967184
,
Sep 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@419371 33554432 0.0 18 good chromium@419386 33554432 0.0 18 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 648158 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:effective_size_max Relative Change: 0.00% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6938 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001105725465967184 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5781166358003712 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 19 2016
,
Sep 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001086174152700496
,
Sep 19 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author shanmuga.m@samsung.com === Hi shanmuga.m@samsung.com, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : SVG Image intrinsic size should be used if css style size is 'auto' Author : shanmuga.m Commit description: SVG Image's width and height attributes will use intrinsic size, if css style size is 'auto' Spec: https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/embedded.html#Placement https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/geometry.html#Sizing BUG= 493681 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2230963002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#419133} Commit : 3c1a3822848d986337573cfaf2817c8a69417791 Date : Fri Sep 16 08:48:37 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@418371 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@418879 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419006 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419070 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419102 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419118 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419125 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419129 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419131 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419132 16777216 0.0 5 good chromium@419133 33554432 0.0 5 bad <-- chromium@419386 33554432 0.0 5 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 648158 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:effective_size_max Relative Change: 100.00% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6939 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001086174152700496 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5501488288235520 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 20 2016
,
Sep 20 2016
Hello, Getting permission error like below. PermissionError: Attempted to access a file from Cloud Storage but you don't have permission. could you please provide the access.
,
Sep 20 2016
It looks like all the graphs have recovered, which suggests that this might've been some sort of flake (no obvious correlation between the two relevant ranges.)
,
Sep 20 2016
The suspected CL doesn't seem related. Closing since the graphs are recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Sep 19 2016