New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 647825 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Sep 2016
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 1
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

dummy benchmark broken.

Project Member Reported by robert...@chromium.org, Sep 16 2016

Issue description

Build is broken:
dummy_benchmark.noisy_benchmark_1
dummy_benchmark.noisy_benchmark_1.reference

Revision range:
chromium 418950 : 419044

Failing builders:
Win Zenbook Perf (2): https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%20Zenbook%20Perf%20(2)

And many more!



 

Traceback (most recent call last):
  RunBenchmark at C:\b\c\b\Win_Zenbook_Perf__2_\src\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\internal\story_runner.py:327
    benchmark.ShouldTearDownStateAfterEachStorySetRun())
  Run at C:\b\c\b\Win_Zenbook_Perf__2_\src\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\internal\story_runner.py:227
    _RunStoryAndProcessErrorIfNeeded(story, results, state, test)
  _RunStoryAndProcessErrorIfNeeded at C:\b\c\b\Win_Zenbook_Perf__2_\src\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\internal\story_runner.py:86
    state.RunStory(results)
  traced_function at C:\b\c\b\Win_Zenbook_Perf__2_\src\third_party\catapult\common\py_trace_event\py_trace_event\trace_event_impl\decorators.py:52
    return func(*args, **kwargs)
  RunStory at C:\b\c\b\Win_Zenbook_Perf__2_\src\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\page\shared_page_state.py:301
    self._current_page.Run(self)
  Run at C:\b\c\b\Win_Zenbook_Perf__2_\src\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\page\__init__.py:99
    self.RunPageInteractions(action_runner)
  RunPageInteractions at C:\b\c\b\Win_Zenbook_Perf__2_\src\tools\perf\page_sets\dummy_story_set.py:29
    assert action_runner.EvaluateJavaScript('1 + window.__dummy_value') == 3
AssertionError
Yes, This is an intentional breakage for bisect FYI

Status: WontFix (was: Available)
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 17 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Exit Code  Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@418949  0          N/A      20  good
chromium@418965  0          N/A      20  good
chromium@418992  1          N/A      20  bad
chromium@418997  1          N/A      20  bad
chromium@419045  1          N/A      20  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 647825

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests dummy_benchmark.noisy_benchmark_1
Test Metric: gaussian-value/gaussian-value
Relative Change: Zero to non-zero
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/482
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001327323541636784


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5219856679436288

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Components: Speed>Benchmarks>Waterfall
Labels: -Performance-Waterfall

Sign in to add a comment