Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.1% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 418234:418373 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 16 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001369393835689280
,
Sep 16 2016
,
Sep 16 2016
Temporarily declaring bankruptcy on the *desktop* system health benchmark. The number of alerts became unmanageable and the overall process needs to be improved to make it sustainable. The alerts have been turned off and I'm archiving the outstanding regressions. Note: this is just about desktop, the mobile system health stays up.
,
Sep 16 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@418233 20185968 41580.0 5 good chromium@418373 22460553 191612 5 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 647645 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:old_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:old_space:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 10.74% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2383 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001369393835689280 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5333612713476096 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982619879188560784
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:old_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:old_space:effective_size_avg Suspected Commit Range 1 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/88f013bd979ec30333bd7ce6c0bd2e0b5f6f2742..dfd9a7c5ba710ee862117267ac6c9ba343bc94f7 Revision Result N chromium@418233 20185968 +- 41580.0 5 good chromium@418373 22460553 +- 191612 5 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982619879188560784 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5333612713476096 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Sep 16 2016