New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 647628 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 2017
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 644865



Sign in to add a comment

19.8% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 418389:418438

Project Member Reported by primiano@chromium.org, Sep 16 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=647628

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg2eTc_wgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 16 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1665
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 16 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1665
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 17 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1672
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Blockedon: 644865
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 25 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1682
Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.

Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 27 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@418343  191.507  18.7535  18  good
chromium@418423  192.59   19.8063  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 647628

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
Test Metric: timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.qq.com_
Relative Change: 2.98%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6942
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000461820760921024


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5880446229938176

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Owner: ----
perf sheriff fixit: unsetting owners of bugs owned by sheriffs to clarify the sheriffing rotation triages the bugs.
Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Archiving as bisection is difficult and there's been no movement.
Project Member

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 10 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___goo.ne.jp_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@418343      175.316 +- 581.615      21      good
chromium@418423      215.812 +- 1121.98      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...goo.ne.jp. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982671293797220048

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4948860416294912


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment