New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 647623 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 2017
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 418327:418420

Project Member Reported by primiano@chromium.org, Sep 16 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=647623

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg2bberQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 17 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@418326  141380  159.203  12  good
chromium@418420  142541  1647.46  12  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 647623

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: background-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/after_https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true
Relative Change: 0.93%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/677
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001370972588068400


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4568586025172992

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 17 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@418326  141380  159.203  12  good
chromium@418420  142541  1647.46  12  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 647623

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: background-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/after_https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true
Relative Change: 0.93%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/677
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001370972588068400


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4568586025172992

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 19 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@418326  141380  159.203  12  good
chromium@418420  142541  1647.46  12  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 647623

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: background-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/after_https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true
Relative Change: 0.81%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/681
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001370972588068400


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4568586025172992

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 23 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@418326  141380  159.203  12  good
chromium@418420  142592  1570.0   8   bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 647623

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true
Relative Change: 0.93%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/687
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9000819387794374496


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5910531200778240

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 27 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@418326  141380  156.844  18  good
chromium@418420  142131  1425.64  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 647623

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true
Relative Change: 0.81%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/696
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001370972588068400


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4568586025172992

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Owner: ----
perf sheriff fixit: unsetting owners of bugs owned by sheriffs to clarify the sheriffing rotation triages the bugs.
Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Archiving as bisection is difficult and there's been no movement.

Sign in to add a comment