Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
68.4% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 417954:418000 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 16 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001371204886743008
,
Sep 16 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@417953 16.2071 2.02488 18 good chromium@418000 16.3802 1.90761 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 647621 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Test Metric: mean_main_thread_scroll_latency/mean_main_thread_scroll_latency Relative Change: 3.07% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1621 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001371204886743008 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6460891573256192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 23 2016
The graph has recovered fully. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Sep 16 2016