Several PFQ failures due to timeouts |
|||
Issue descriptionCurrently, the following builders are failing due to timeouts in the HWTests phase: cyan-chrome-pfq: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/cyan-chrome-pfq/builds/173 falco-chrome-pfq: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/lumpy-chrome-pfq/builds/9122 lumpy-chrome-pfq: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/lumpy-chrome-pfq/builds/9122 tricky-chrome-pfq: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/tricky-chrome-pfq/builds/2355 The HWTest phase seems to take almost 2 hours [See attached screenshot for cyan].
,
Sep 19 2016
Looking at a few of these from this master build: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/master-chromium-pfq/builds/3383 All 3 timed out even though looking at autoserv.INFO all tests appear to pass. There is the following warning though: parallel_simple was called with an empty arglist, did you forget to pass in a list of machines?
,
Sep 19 2016
The failures in comment #1 all timed out in HWTest [sanity]. Three of them had autoserv logs that look like this: 09/14 23:51:07.186 INFO | server_job:0129| INFO ---- Start sanity timestamp=1473922267 localtime=Sep 14 23:51:07 09/14 23:51:07.186 DEBUG| suite:0825| Scheduling dummy_PassServer.sanity 09/14 23:51:07.633 DEBUG| suite:1079| Adding job keyval for dummy_PassServer.sanity=77036127-chromeos-test 09/14 23:51:07.633 DEBUG| dynamic_suite:0554| Waiting on suite. 09/15 02:54:42.390 INFO | server_job:0129| START ---- cyan-chrome-pfq/R55-8803.0.0-rc1/sanity/dummy_PassServer.sanity timestamp=1473933282 localtime=Sep 15 02:54:42 There is a 3 hour delay after "Waiting on suite." The 4th appeared to run successfully but the builder thought it failed and aborted. I have seen that elsewhere (e.g. in comment #2).
,
Sep 19 2016
The arm-generic timeouts are this: issue 648436
,
Sep 26 2016
I don't see any consistent pattern to timeouts at this point, there are several open time out related issues. |
|||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||
Comment 1 by x...@chromium.org
, Sep 15 2016