Good point. Thanks for bringing this up, Kevin! David, if it's not possible to fix this in the short term (considering other priorities), perhaps we should specify this in our documentation? 

Actually I don't think this makes sense because sequencing mimics typing. A non-modifier when held means to repeat the key. Also, in the proposed behavior,  one would not be able to press cvox o o unambiguously without the second press of o. more It sounds like perhaps you just want time date reading to not be sequenced.