Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1%-1.4% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 417986:418039 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 14 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001536420705108784
,
Sep 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@417988 1153945 2097.17 8 good chromium@418014 1156096 4194.33 8 good chromium@418016 1163673 3950.01 5 bad chromium@418018 1162035 3792.16 8 bad chromium@418021 1162035 3792.16 8 bad chromium@418027 1161856 3662.59 8 bad chromium@418039 1162240 3959.08 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 646860 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: background-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/after_http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Relative Change: 0.55% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4124 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001536420705108784 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5329945750929408 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 23 2016
Recovered.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982619920938694336
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : background-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/after_http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Suspected Commit Range 1 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/a74d3cbc572fa1c85cc2c0434a9f8e2f9cba0cd9..b63103ad596cb2deaf5151dd81de45de688dedeb Revision Result N chromium@417988 1153945 +- 2097.17 8 good chromium@418014 1156096 +- 4194.33 8 good chromium@418016 1163673 +- 3950.01 5 bad chromium@418018 1162035 +- 3792.16 8 bad chromium@418021 1162035 +- 3792.16 8 bad chromium@418027 1161856 +- 3662.59 8 bad chromium@418039 1162240 +- 3959.08 8 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982619920938694336 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5329945750929408 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kouhei@chromium.org
, Sep 14 2016