Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
[FATAL:url_request.cc(121)] Check failed: !connect_timing->connect_end.is_null |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSadly don't have any backtrace information since the Galaxy Nexus requires static builds with symbol_level=0|1. Seen on vimeo.com just loading the page.
,
Sep 12 2016
Commenting out that line causes the subsequent DCHECK to also fail: DCHECK(!connect_timing->ssl_end.is_null());
,
Sep 12 2016
Thanks for the report, dalecurtis. Helen, could you PTAL? Your change (https://codereview.chromium.org/2324183002) only affects quic afaict but it's worth double checking (this might be for a Google property). dalecurtis, was this before or after 417969?
,
Sep 12 2016
,
Sep 12 2016
Issue 646111 has been merged into this issue.
,
Sep 12 2016
Built at #417986
,
Sep 12 2016
For me, this happend on a standard linux build. The request was: https://accounts.google.com/ListAccounts?gpsia=1&source=ChromiumBrowser&json=standard I have it running in a debugger right now, anything else I should find out?
,
Sep 12 2016
Helen is OOO, should should we revert the https://codereview.chromium.org/2324183002 for now?
,
Sep 12 2016
I've reverted https://codereview.chromium.org/2333863003, could you check that it has fixed the problem?
,
Sep 12 2016
Issue 646131 has been merged into this issue.
,
Sep 12 2016
This was not a P3; it was a P0. Chromium builds on multiple platforms were broken. The reporter should have been confident in labeling it as such. Adjusting the priority and blocking the feature bug on this one.
,
Sep 12 2016
Thanks kbr@, it wasn't clear to me the scope of this issue until issue 646131 but I agree this was a major problem. Can you confirm that the revert has fixed things for you?
,
Sep 12 2016
The reporter in this case (me) only saw it on one page on a crappy old device so I just left the defaults :)
,
Sep 12 2016
Yeah I just sync and rebuild, now the crash is gone
,
Sep 12 2016
It seems to me that the problem is really testing. Something like this landed with no tests catching it, this is just concerning.
,
Sep 12 2016
Thanks a lot for verifying the fix. Agreed we should definitely add some QUIC tests to cover this case. I filed issue 646087 for this.
,
Sep 12 2016
,
Sep 12 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by dalecur...@chromium.org
, Sep 12 2016