New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 645840 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: Fixed
Owner:
Closed: Oct 2016
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Android , Windows , Chrome , Mac
Pri: 2
Type: Launch-OWP
Launch-Accessibility: NotReviewed
Launch-Exp-Leadership: ----
Launch-Leadership: ----
Launch-Legal: NotReviewed
Launch-M-Approved: ----
Launch-M-Target: 55-Dev
Launch-Privacy: NotReviewed
Launch-Security: NotReviewed
Launch-Test: NotReviewed
Launch-UI: NotReviewed
Rollout-Type: ----



Sign in to add a comment

CSS: New names for motion path properties

Project Member Reported by ericwilligers@chromium.org, Sep 12 2016

Issue description

Change description:
The motion-* property names have been replaced with offset-*
The old names become deprecated, to be removed.

Changes to API surface:
motion-path becomes offset-path
motion-offset becomes offset-distance
motion-rotation becomes offset-rotation
motion becomes offset

Links:
Spec: https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion-1/

Public standards discussion:
CSSWG action: https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/actions/781
Merged pull request: https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/pull/14

Support in other browsers:
No other browsers support Motion Path yet.

 

Comment 1 by suzyh@chromium.org, Oct 10 2016

Labels: Objective
Status: Fixed (was: Assigned)
Labels: Launch-Status-Approval-Requested

Comment 4 by jmedley@google.com, Oct 11 2016

Eric,

Can you please put the right version number on the chrome status entry?

https://www.chromestatus.com/features/6390764217040896

Thanks,
Joe

Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmedley@google.com |
 816-678-7195
*If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.*
> Can you please put the right version number on the chrome status entry?
> https://www.chromestatus.com/features/6390764217040896

Done
M58 is branching next week and there are some deprecation messages linked to this work, for M58. Are we on track for removal or do we need to edit the target milestone?
Ok for removal. We should mention in the blog that authors should use offset-path instead.

Sign in to add a comment