New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 645575 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

11.1% regression in blink_perf.shadow_dom at 416467:416469

Project Member Reported by rsch...@chromium.org, Sep 9 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=645575

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgsfTahwgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus9

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@416466  107.367  8.99365  18  good
chromium@416469  106.737  6.68001  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 645575

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom
Test Metric: ShadowReprojection/ShadowReprojection
Relative Change: 1.80%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2104
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001971116237411040


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6405982261870592

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Cc: rsch...@chromium.org
 Issue 645574  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 13 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@416458  107.2    7.1781   18  good
chromium@416469  105.923  7.44701  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 645575

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom
Test Metric: ShadowReprojection/ShadowReprojection
Relative Change: 5.82%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2107
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001681439714138880


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5831660912771072

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 13 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@416458  106.397  5.00985  18  good
chromium@416470  105.718  6.231    18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 645575

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom
Test Metric: ShadowReprojection/ShadowReprojection
Relative Change: 3.20%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2110
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001668743822630880


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5897434142605312

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Owner: ----
Perf sheriff fixit: removing owners from bugs owned by the sheriffs who filed them to clarify that the rotation triages the bugs.
Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Archiving as bisection is difficult and there's been no movement.

Sign in to add a comment