Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.1% regression in blink_perf.shadow_dom at 416467:416469 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001971118106193552
,
Sep 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@416466 107.529 5.87876 18 good chromium@416469 106.222 6.88685 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 645574 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom Test Metric: ShadowReprojection/ShadowReprojection Relative Change: 2.87% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2103 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001971118106193552 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5158861281951744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 12 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rsch...@chromium.org
, Sep 9 2016