Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
70%-70.2% regression in page_cycler_v2.top_10_mobile at 416449:416451 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001971612951405984
,
Sep 9 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2187 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001963929346842688
,
Sep 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001963926368862896
,
Sep 9 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2188 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 9 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2189 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001956437787321088
,
Sep 9 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2189 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 10 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001865224219753616
,
Sep 11 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2192 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 12 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001682996864451520
,
Sep 12 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001682855905220864
,
Sep 13 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2193 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 13 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2194 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 13 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001668970388825408
,
Sep 13 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2195 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 18 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001223230651936544
,
Sep 18 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2192 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 20 2016
,
Oct 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999954750525300928
,
Oct 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@416448 231.629 16.2739 18 good chromium@416451 228.589 3.20796 18 bad Bisect job ran on: win_8_perf_bisect Bug ID: 645562 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.top_10_mobile Test Metric: timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___yandex.ru_touchsearch?text_science Relative Change: 4.99% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2219 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001963926368862896 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5004208216997888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 6 2016
Perf sheriff fixit: removing owners from bugs owned by the sheriffs who filed them to clarify that the rotation triages the bugs.
,
Nov 22 2016
,
Jan 6 2017
Archiving as bisection is difficult and there's been no movement.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651846057986304
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982643933043268560
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982640161283606416
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.top_10_mobile Metric : pcv1-cold-timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/http___yandex.ru_touchsearch?text_science To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651846057986304 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5211007402639360 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.top_10_mobile Metric : pcv1-cold-timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/http___yandex.ru_touchsearch?text_science To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982643933043268560 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5241023452676096 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rsch...@chromium.org
, Sep 9 2016