Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3%-48.5% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 417088:417296 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001972179483550768
,
Sep 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@417087 1763573 2501.64 5 good chromium@417140 1737359 849.23 5 good chromium@417153 1737359 1997.92 5 good chromium@417166 2598174 1543.51 5 bad chromium@417192 2600304 1436.47 5 bad chromium@417296 2605383 3084.4 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 645553 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: foreground-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html Relative Change: 47.73% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1611 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001972179483550768 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6732840547385344 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 12 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001682273294115936
,
Sep 12 2016
Narrowed to 417153-417166. Trying some bisects there.
,
Sep 12 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001682251324288080
,
Sep 13 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : cc: Change preraster/predecode split to be half of max skewport extent. Author : vmpstr Commit description: This patch iterates on the raster/decode split to include skewport into consideration. Specifically, in addition to limiting preraster to 1000 pixels, we also limit it by half of the skewport extent, where skewport extent is the largest padding in any direction away from the viewport. The tough scrolling cases seems to indicate that checkerboards remain roughly the same with this patch. R=enne CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_precise_blink_rel Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2317913002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#417164} Commit : 1a4f3af8e0b96d1517939be11395132f9faa5e8c Date : Thu Sep 08 02:16:50 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@417153 8115978 36701.7 5 good chromium@417160 8134820 30773.7 5 good chromium@417163 8139079 18997.4 5 good chromium@417164 8960409 28659.9 5 bad <-- chromium@417165 8943534 16038.2 5 bad chromium@417166 8947138 18844.9 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 645553 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: foreground-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true Relative Change: 10.24% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4117 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001682273294115936 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5782628492378112 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 13 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@417087 1880227 621.334 5 good chromium@417140 1856061 224.566 5 good chromium@417153 1855979 342.672 5 good chromium@417160 1864007 16113.9 5 good chromium@417163 1859748 466.99 5 good chromium@417165 1933476 224.019 5 bad chromium@417166 1933558 366.212 5 bad chromium@417192 1933721 409.5 5 bad chromium@417296 1937653 224.019 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 645553 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: foreground-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Relative Change: 3.05% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1614 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001682251324288080 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5859217422942208 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rsch...@chromium.org
, Sep 9 2016