New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 645547 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

79.4%-95.7% regression in cc_perftests at 414496:414542

Project Member Reported by rsch...@chromium.org, Sep 9 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/989
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 13 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/997
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 13 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/998
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Cc: rsch...@chromium.org
Owner: dim...@chromium.org
This CL is suspicious. Assigning to author.

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9ee7a4109cbc763067538c360c36ff2e1ba3ee13


Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1083
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Any updates? dimich - could this be your CL that regressed this benchmark?
Owner: benhenry@chromium.org
As I understand it, the failed test is compositor perftest, specifically having nothing to do with a page load. I don't see how my CL could potentially affect the compositor serialization code which seems to be testing the speed of serializing IPC messages for compositor.

Some changes in generic IPC or in cc/ folder could probably be more responsible.
Owner: ----
Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This bot has been decommissioned.

Sign in to add a comment