Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
79.4%-95.7% regression in cc_perftests at 414496:414542 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001972692286090112
,
Sep 9 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/989 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 13 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001681137706528320
,
Sep 13 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/997 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Sep 13 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001669397808928736
,
Sep 13 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/998 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 6 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999517716230919408
,
Oct 6 2016
This CL is suspicious. Assigning to author. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9ee7a4109cbc763067538c360c36ff2e1ba3ee13
,
Oct 6 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1083 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 26 2016
Any updates? dimich - could this be your CL that regressed this benchmark?
,
Oct 26 2016
As I understand it, the failed test is compositor perftest, specifically having nothing to do with a page load. I don't see how my CL could potentially affect the compositor serialization code which seems to be testing the speed of serializing IPC messages for compositor. Some changes in generic IPC or in cc/ folder could probably be more responsible.
,
Oct 26 2016
,
Dec 15 2016
This bot has been decommissioned.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620131169768832
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982607815813930096 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rsch...@chromium.org
, Sep 9 2016