Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.3% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 416077:416104 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 6 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9002261248268876336
,
Sep 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@416076 199525 733.581 8 good chromium@416091 198747 1046.97 8 good chromium@416098 199182 910.638 8 good chromium@416101 198677 944.342 8 good chromium@416103 199567 199.946 5 good chromium@416104 201283 1317.86 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 644259 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:allocated_objects_size_avg Relative Change: 0.79% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2092 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9002261248268876336 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5273589253668864 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 27 2016
Recovered already.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982632170270665616
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:map_space:allocated_objects_size_avg Suspected Commit Range 1 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/fadb58864d3a99cd09b89d31994d4286f4cb60d2..77d1f985eaad21ef85fbee669b7ecf61c8cf6faf Revision Result N chromium@416076 199525 +- 733.581 8 good chromium@416091 198747 +- 1046.97 8 good chromium@416098 199182 +- 910.638 8 good chromium@416101 198677 +- 944.342 8 good chromium@416103 199567 +- 199.946 5 good chromium@416104 201283 +- 1317.86 8 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982632170270665616 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5273589253668864 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mlippautz@chromium.org
, Sep 6 2016