Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
47.8% regression in top_10_mobile_memory_ignition at 414964:414974 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9002372991097228448
,
Sep 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@414963 865652 7239.5 21 good chromium@414974 861952 6367.97 19 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 644070 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests top_10_mobile_memory_ignition Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:code_space:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 0.72% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4082 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9002372991097228448 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776335039889408 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 29 2016
,
Nov 8 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mlippautz@chromium.org
, Sep 5 2016