Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.8%-6.9% regression in webrtc_perf_tests at 13994:14005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee graphs below.
,
Sep 2 2016
Hi Henrik, it looks like there was a recent regression in neteq perf stats, but it's unclear which CL is causing it due to the very gradual deterioration. Could you have a look and investigate?
,
Sep 2 2016
,
Sep 2 2016
I tried to reproduce this locally on a Nexus 5 in a number of different ways (including git bisect). Eventually I built and tested #13987 and #14009 in release builds on the 0_pl_0_drift test. My results were as follows: #13987: 8992, 8823, 8874, 8817, 8871, 8872, 8903, 8878, 8761, 8826, 8811 average: 8857 #14009: 8710, 8721, 8741, 8736, 8707, 8709, 8744, 8725, 8732, 8740, 8700 average: 8724 Could it be related to build changes? (I used only GN).
,
Sep 5 2016
Maybe build related, but nevertheless I think we can close this. You've done local testing and could not repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ivoc@chromium.org
, Sep 2 2016