New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 643682 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Sep 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

2.8%-6.9% regression in webrtc_perf_tests at 13994:14005

Project Member Reported by ivoc@chromium.org, Sep 2 2016

Issue description

See graphs below.
 

Comment 2 by ivoc@chromium.org, Sep 2 2016

Cc: ossu@chromium.org
Labels: -M-52 M-55
Owner: hlundin@chromium.org
Hi Henrik, it looks like there was a recent regression in neteq perf stats, but it's unclear which CL is causing it due to the very gradual deterioration. Could you have a look and investigate?

Comment 3 by ivoc@chromium.org, Sep 2 2016

Cc: ivoc@chromium.org

Comment 4 by ossu@chromium.org, Sep 2 2016

I tried to reproduce this locally on a Nexus 5 in a number of different ways (including git bisect). Eventually I built and tested #13987 and #14009 in release builds on the 0_pl_0_drift test. My results were as follows:

#13987: 8992, 8823, 8874, 8817, 8871, 8872, 8903, 8878, 8761, 8826, 8811
average: 8857

#14009: 8710, 8721, 8741, 8736, 8707, 8709, 8744, 8725, 8732, 8740, 8700
average: 8724

Could it be related to build changes? (I used only GN).



Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Maybe build related, but nevertheless I think we can close this. You've done local testing and could not repro.

Sign in to add a comment