Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
13% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases at 415546:415569 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 31 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9002770042695802672
,
Sep 1 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@415545 6.49861 0.184745 21 good chromium@415569 6.65014 0.27291 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 642971 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Test Metric: cpu_utilization/crowd.wav_browser Relative Change: 3.56% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4079 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9002770042695802672 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5895136083443712 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 1 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by w...@chromium.org
, Aug 31 2016