Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
197%-274.4% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 413321:413335 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003234351584525792
,
Aug 26 2016
These are on master=ChromiumPerfFyi, so should be ignored despite the scary amount of regressions. Pasted from the SpeedInfra chat: Likely related to the catapult roll: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapult.git/+log/04dd47e541e2..30ce231266c6 Ned's changes in that roll changed the test
,
Aug 26 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/1148 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624500190943280
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Metric : pcv1-cold-timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/http___www.google.com.hk__q_%E9%82%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B_fp_c44d333e710cb480 To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624500190943280 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5280874619207680 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mustaq@chromium.org
, Aug 26 2016